When John ended his letter with the admonition, “Little
children, protect yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21), it seems to come out of
nowhere. Up to this point, John hasn’t
mentioned the threat of idolatry at all.
Other enemies have been named:
the devil/the evil one, the world, false prophets, antichrists, liars,
and haters. But in all of John’s
warnings about needing to “overcome” their enemies, the problem of idolatry was
never mentioned—until the end. Why? Was it an after thought? “Oh, yes.
One more thing. I’d better warn them about idols before I sign off. After all, that’s the lesson we Jews finally
learned after hundreds of years of worshipping false gods. Don’t mess with idols. Idolatry only leads to immorality.”[1] And yet, John doesn’t warn them about the
perils of idolatry (eidololatria). It’s the idol itself that poses a threat to
his community.[2] So, what does John mean by the term eidolon?
Eidolon derives
from the root eido, meaning “what is
seen.”[3] Since Jesus Christ is the true God—the
“what-can-be-seen” of the invisible God—then all idols stand in opposition to
the claims of that one-of-a-kind divine revelation. That’s why John pits the Icon of the
invisible God against all other pretenders, eidolon
that pose as icons of invisible deity. John
sees things from a very Jewish perspective, a binary world of worshippers of
the one true God and the idolaters. Similarly, Wisdom of Solomon 14:13 comes in
the midst of several warnings the sage has been giving to his people about the
folly of idols (13:1-14:31). After
citing the Jewish claim that idols lead to immorality (13:12), he says an idol
“neither was from the beginning nor shall it be to the age. For through human vainglory it came into the
world” (vv. 13-14). Since subjects in
distant lands couldn’t honor their king, they made a “visible image [eikon]” of the one who was “absent
though present” (v. 17). The same was
true in John’s day; busts of Caesar were set up all over the Roman Empire to
remind citizens to celebrate and subjects to fear his imperial rule—what the
sage considered a precursor to making idols of “the unmentionable name”
(God). Idols, therefore, became “a trap
in life” (v. 21), leading devotees to false worship. And so, according to the sage, idols were
man’s feeble attempt to make present the invisible God.[4]
But John had been making the case throughout his writings
that when the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, it was the only revelation
of God that we would ever need. Furthermore,
when the Church obeys the commandment of Christ to love one another as he has
loved us, then the visible presence of the invisible God—his love—“abides”
among us (1 John 4:16). But what happens
when we don’t love one another, when the love of Christ isn’t present, when the
absence of God is evident? Then lonely
men and women will go “looking for love in all the wrong places.” In the vacuum of the absence of God’s love,
John knew we would turn to idols—vacuous promises of divine presence. That’s why, I think, John kept reminding his
community about the love of God, the command to love one another like Christ,
the danger of claiming to love God but hating our brother, and the importance
of abiding in the word they heard from John’s Gospel. “This vision of place, friendship, mutuality,
and service that is embodied in
residential communities all over the world is rooted in the belief that Jesus’s
gift of friendship and love creates new and surprising forms of friendship
between those who would otherwise be alienated from one another.”[5] Indeed, if people don’t find the love of
Christ in the Church (incarnation!), they’ll look to idols—any visible hope of deity—that alienate them
from God and from us.
[1]A common theme in Jewish
polemics against idolatry: “For the idea
of making idols was the beginning of fornication, and the invention of them was
the corruption of life” (Wis. Sol. 14:12, NRSV); see also Rom. 1:21-25.
[2]“The choice of the term eidolon, rather than the conceptual term
eidololatr(e)ia, is significant. The rejection of idols, according to John, is
the obverse of knowing the true God,” Terry Griffith, Keep Yourselves from Idols: A
New Look at 1 John, JSNT Supp 233 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002), p. 57.
[3]For an excellent survey of
the meaning and background of eidolon,
see Griffith, Keep Yourselves from Idols,
pp. 28-57.
[4]“We may conclude that the
image functioned in the cult as a mediator of the divine presence. It was the means by which humans gained
access to the presence of the deity. As
such it represented the mystical unity of transcendence and immanence, at
theophany transubstantiated,” John Walton, Ancient
Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament:
Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible (Grand
Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), pp.
117-18.
[5]Jipp, Hospitality, p. 94 (emphasis mine).
Here Jipp is referring to residential communities like L’Arche. But, I wonder whether his description of
their ministry shouldn’t also be the reality of the Church. In other words, perhaps “residential
communities” have something to teach us about what it means to be the
“embodied” love of Christ.